POLL: Website Features

Jim Trunzo · 01-30-2004, 02:28 PM

We want to start working on enhancing the boxing website and making it a place for frequent visitation. What would you most like to see added?

Kevin · 01-30-2004, 05:34 PM

I only voted for my top pick but would enjoy all of the first five greatly.

darthpb · 01-30-2004, 09:05 PM

Well said, Kevin. I agree...

jabbo · 01-31-2004, 12:19 AM

I'd like to see a feedback section on ratings, so that we can get a consensus on some fighters. I am fairly knowledgeable about heavyweights since 1960, but I hesitate to alter the originals as I am only one observer. I would like to know a little bit more about how ratings are arrived at, and whether you lean more toward visual observation or duplication of fight results.

To me, Alex Stewart, who has no real significant wins on his record, should not rate higher than Jerry Quarry or Ron Lyle, who I rate 12th and 13th of all heavies since 1960. How much is Stewart's performances in high profile fights (he often looked very tough while losing) factored in?

Bob

BrocktonBlockBuster · 01-31-2004, 12:56 AM

By the way Jim,I enjoyed your article about rating Joe Grim. Also,the article about covering-up.

Cap · 01-31-2004, 10:33 AM

How about links to gamer sites like Cubedrum's or JR's bare-ka-nuckle site?

How about an historical piece on an obscure fighter? Like Stanley Poreda, for instance. And include a photo.

Cap

View Poll Results: What would you like to see added to the boxing website?
Boxer profiles	20	46.51%
Historical boxing features	14	32.56%
Our independing boxing Rankings (incl. Top 10)	11	25.58%
Links to other boxing sites	3	6.98%
TBCB varients - playing scenarios	20	46.51%
Contests with prizes	2	4.65%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

01-30-2004, 02:28 PM	#1 (permalink)
Jim Trunzo OOTP Developments Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Leechburg, PA Posts: 740	POLL: Website Features We want to start working on enhancing the boxing website and making it a place for frequent visitation. What would you most like to see added?

01-30-2004, 05:34 PM	#2 (permalink)
Kevin Major Leagues Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Nova Scotia Posts: 467	I only voted for my top pick but would enjoy all of the first five greatly. __________________ It seems more like today than it did all day yesterday.

01-31-2004, 10:33 AM	#6 (permalink)
Cap Hall Of Famer Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Large Province in God's Country Posts: 4,004	How about links to gamer sites like Cubedrum's or JR's bare-ka-nuckle site? How about an historical piece on an obscure fighter? Like Stanley Poreda, for instance. And include a photo. Cap __________________ "...There were Giants in Those Days.."

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-30-2004, 09:05 PM	#3 (permalink)
darthpb All Star Reserve Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Queens, NY a mile from Shea Posts: 637	Well said, Kevin. I agree...

01-31-2004, 12:19 AM	#4 (permalink)
jabbo Minors (Single A) Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 73	I'd like to see a feedback section on ratings, so that we can get a consensus on some fighters. I am fairly knowledgeable about heavyweights since 1960, but I hesitate to alter the originals as I am only one observer. I would like to know a little bit more about how ratings are arrived at, and whether you lean more toward visual observation or duplication of fight results. To me, Alex Stewart, who has no real significant wins on his record, should not rate higher than Jerry Quarry or Ron Lyle, who I rate 12th and 13th of all heavies since 1960. How much is Stewart's performances in high profile fights (he often looked very tough while losing) factored in? Bob

01-31-2004, 12:56 AM	#5 (permalink)
BrocktonBlockBuster Minors (Triple A) Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 280	By the way Jim,I enjoyed your article about rating Joe Grim. Also,the article about covering-up.