a poll

thebadguy · 03-31-2004, 05:04 PM

It has been implied that Jim and Tom's system over the past several years will be tarnished if the 1 point system turns out to be more accurate. Just wanted to hear from you guys and get your opinion on this. Thanks.

dempsonny · 04-01-2004, 06:43 PM

No, their board game had increments of 1 and that was fine, I don't see why there would be a negative impact of using increments of 1. Maybe they deemed it not necessary to do in the computer game, but if it turns out for the better, it improves an already good product. The increments of 1 is something we the users of the board game became comfortable with. I think I remember Ezzard Charles for instance being a 1-45 in punches landed and Corbett being a -5 in defense. I thought I remembered defence going up to +8 in the board game is that correct?

wildhawke11 · 04-01-2004, 08:00 PM

In the board game HW Ezzard Charles was a Punches Landed of 46.
Corbett your correct, was a defence of -5 his PL was 45.

The defence went from -6 to +6 in the game.
Cheers
Danny

Sorry i forget to add. In no way would Jim's image be tarnished by any changes, we live and learn all the time. Its called progress

crusadecat · 04-02-2004, 09:08 PM

I think another poll needs to be conducted on whether a 1 pt system is needed at this time or not.

View Poll Results: Will the Trunzo's lose credibility in your mind if the 1 point system works?
Yes	3	8.82%
No	31	91.18%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

03-31-2004, 05:04 PM	#1 (permalink)
thebadguy Major Leagues Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Ephrata, WA Posts: 429	a poll It has been implied that Jim and Tom's system over the past several years will be tarnished if the 1 point system turns out to be more accurate. Just wanted to hear from you guys and get your opinion on this. Thanks. __________________ "You need people like me... you need people like me so you can point your ***ing fingers... and say, thats the badguy!" - Al Pacino (Scarface) Last edited by thebadguy : 03-31-2004 at 05:11 PM.*

04-01-2004, 06:43 PM	#2 (permalink)
dempsonny Major Leagues Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: long island, n.y. Posts: 321	No, their board game had increments of 1 and that was fine, I don't see why there would be a negative impact of using increments of 1. Maybe they deemed it not necessary to do in the computer game, but if it turns out for the better, it improves an already good product. The increments of 1 is something we the users of the board game became comfortable with. I think I remember Ezzard Charles for instance being a 1-45 in punches landed and Corbett being a -5 in defense. I thought I remembered defence going up to +8 in the board game is that correct? __________________ A house without a dog is not a home.

04-01-2004, 08:00 PM	#3 (permalink)
wildhawke11 All Star Starter Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: united kingdom Posts: 1,834	In the board game HW Ezzard Charles was a Punches Landed of 46. Corbett your correct, was a defence of -5 his PL was 45. The defence went from -6 to +6 in the game. Cheers Danny Sorry i forget to add. In no way would Jim's image be tarnished by any changes, we live and learn all the time. Its called progress Last edited by wildhawke11 : 04-01-2004 at 08:11 PM.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-02-2004, 09:08 PM	#4 (permalink)
crusadecat All Star Reserve Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 799	I think another poll needs to be conducted on whether a 1 pt system is needed at this time or not.