Negative points for a win

CONN CHRIS · 05-30-2006, 07:49 AM

This business of handing out negative PP for a win really needs to be fixed. There should be a minimum value for a win regardless how poor the opponent is. Even zero points awarded as a minimum would be preferable to loosing points by beating a stiff.

Christopher

mh2365 · 05-30-2006, 09:25 AM

Yeah whenever I have a high ranked guy vs a low ranked guy, I check it at the end of the fight. I usually set the min at 20, so if he got less than 20 for the win then I manually adjust it.

CONN CHRIS · 07-06-2006, 10:43 PM

When you can get to it Andreas, this really is a glaring problem that needs to be fixed.

Thank you

mh2365 · 07-07-2006, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CONN CHRIS

When you can get to it Andreas, this really is a glaring problem that needs to be fixed.

Thank you

It's on my list in the beta thread but is it that big of a problem for you? You must have alot more ranked fighters in your universe than I do, because I have yet to see negative points. I've seen single digits but not negative.

CONN CHRIS · 07-07-2006, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mh2365

It's on my list in the beta thread but is it that big of a problem for you? You must have alot more ranked fighters in your universe than I do, because I have yet to see negative points. I've seen single digits but not negative.

Well, I have over 8,000 active fighters including the cannon fodder. Where I see it the most is in the developmental stages of a rookie. They will have 5 or 6 fights under their belts, all wins against stiffs (some ranked - some not) and a negative value for each win. And odd values at that like -7.29 or -3.62.

mh2365 · 07-07-2006, 03:56 PM

okay ... now I could see that but I don't let any of the TC's drop below -100. I have them in a different groups so they aren't ranked or scheduled, it is strictly autoschedules for them. At the end of each month any TC that has dropped below -100 I change them back to positive 100. Now if eventually I get a ton more ranked I could have that problem. Anyone who drops below 20 I will manually give them 20.

It'd be nice if it would do it for you though.

CONN CHRIS · 07-13-2006, 11:03 PM

I belabor the point only because Andreas popped in today:

Andreas:

Would it be difficult to code a floor for the pp awarded on a win without messing up the whole system? It would be great to have negative points never awarded for a win no matter how poor the opponent is.

Christopher

mh2365 · 07-14-2006, 09:03 AM

I think 20 is a good bottom line

Non Compos Mentis · 07-14-2006, 02:57 PM

I think making it configurable by the user (like the rating system) would probably be the best option.

mh2365 · 07-14-2006, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Non Compos Mentis

I think making it configurable by the user (like the rating system) would probably be the best option.

of course

CONN CHRIS · 07-16-2006, 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mh2365

At the end of each month any TC that has dropped below -100 I change them back to positive 100. Now if eventually I get a ton more ranked I could have that problem.

Ok, I am starting to do this. I do it division by division before I do a month's scheduling. It is a royal pain in the neck the first time through but should be easier once I go through one cycle.

mh2365 · 07-16-2006, 12:41 PM

Yeah I only do this with the TC's which I keep in a seperate group. I have no bottom for real fighters but I do check PP at the end of each fight if one fighter is really low ranked. At that point I make sure the winner gets at least 20 for the fight.

I end up changed 1 or 2 TC's in each weight class each month. I have so many TC's that it doesn't take much. I keep no track of TC's records or anything. I will use the same one's forever.

05-30-2006, 07:49 AM	#1 (permalink)
CONN CHRIS Global Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 21,322	Negative points for a win This business of handing out negative PP for a win really needs to be fixed. There should be a minimum value for a win regardless how poor the opponent is. Even zero points awarded as a minimum would be preferable to loosing points by beating a stiff. Christopher __________________ REC World Prizefighter Rankings

07-06-2006, 10:43 PM	#3 (permalink)
CONN CHRIS Global Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 21,322	When you can get to it Andreas, this really is a glaring problem that needs to be fixed. Thank you __________________ REC World Prizefighter Rankings

07-13-2006, 11:03 PM	#7 (permalink)
CONN CHRIS Global Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 21,322	I belabor the point only because Andreas popped in today: Andreas: Would it be difficult to code a floor for the pp awarded on a win without messing up the whole system? It would be great to have negative points never awarded for a win no matter how poor the opponent is. Christopher __________________ REC World Prizefighter Rankings

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-30-2006, 09:25 AM	#2 (permalink)
mh2365 Banned Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: louisville Posts: 14,963 Warnings: 2	Yeah whenever I have a high ranked guy vs a low ranked guy, I check it at the end of the fight. I usually set the min at 20, so if he got less than 20 for the win then I manually adjust it.

07-07-2006, 03:56 PM	#6 (permalink)
mh2365 Banned Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: louisville Posts: 14,963 Warnings: 2	okay ... now I could see that but I don't let any of the TC's drop below -100. I have them in a different groups so they aren't ranked or scheduled, it is strictly autoschedules for them. At the end of each month any TC that has dropped below -100 I change them back to positive 100. Now if eventually I get a ton more ranked I could have that problem. Anyone who drops below 20 I will manually give them 20. It'd be nice if it would do it for you though.

07-14-2006, 09:03 AM	#8 (permalink)
mh2365 Banned Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: louisville Posts: 14,963 Warnings: 2	I think 20 is a good bottom line

07-14-2006, 02:57 PM	#9 (permalink)
Non Compos Mentis Minors (Double A) Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 128	I think making it configurable by the user (like the rating system) would probably be the best option.

07-16-2006, 12:41 PM	#12 (permalink)
mh2365 Banned Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: louisville Posts: 14,963 Warnings: 2	Yeah I only do this with the TC's which I keep in a seperate group. I have no bottom for real fighters but I do check PP at the end of each fight if one fighter is really low ranked. At that point I make sure the winner gets at least 20 for the fight. I end up changed 1 or 2 TC's in each weight class each month. I have so many TC's that it doesn't take much. I keep no track of TC's records or anything. I will use the same one's forever.