[mking55]

I just had this happen in a fight.

01:28 Ron Stander connects with an uppercut. He can make good use of that punch if he can continue to get inside.
940 371 27 - 0/0:0/0 - 0:0-10:2

01:28 Referee is giving Ron Stander a warning for using an open glove.
2100 822 21 - 0/0:0/0 - 0:0-10:2

01:28 Referee takes a point away from Stander!
4900 1342 26 - 0/0:0/0 - 0:0-10:2

01:37 Stander's corner is shouting at him to stay off the ropes.
500 230 25 - 0/0:0/0 - 0:0-10:2

01:45 Muhammad Ali gives a nice head feint and then lands a hook to the head of Ron Stander which made him blink.
760 289 27 - 0/0:0/0 - 0:0-12:2

01:45 Ali is being warned for butting. Referee is letting the judges know.
2100 819 21 - 0/0:0/0 - 0:0-12:2

01:49 Referee rules the foul to be blatant! He's disqualifying Muhammad Ali! Stander is the winner by disqualification!
5740 1431 28 - 0/0:0/0 - 0:0-12:2

I think that it is a mistake at the 1:28 mark to say in 1 line that the punch was a good punch and then have the referee see it in the next comment as a foul. The original punch message should be more ambivalent if the ref is going to see a foul.

At 1:45 Ali 'gives a nice head feint' and that hits Stander in the head.
At 1:45 the next comment says that the ref is warning Ali for head butting. But the comment before at 1:45 said it was a hook.
At 1:49 the ref rules the foul to be blatant. Ali is disqualified. What foul? The one at 1:45? If so, he got a warning. If not, where is the comment for the blatant foul that occurred in the previous 4 seconds?

This is very confusing and does not flow. I believe it to be totally out of whack and thought I would let you know.

[Cap]

Sounds like a whopper to me too. I'm sure Jim will want to thank you for pointing this one out.

Cap

[Andreas Raht]

Thanks for pointing this out from me, too :-)
This has to be improved in the program. Actually, throwing an uppercut with an open glove sounds strange to me. More strange than that the reporter doesn't see the foul, but the referee does!